wehateporn

That is why I go straight to the data itself and carefully analyze it. I post experts here because I know that most of you won't know much about who I am, so probably won't take my word for it, but may well be willing to listen to a known expert.

So you've posted a 1995 study which the TEDx professor was involved in, having a look now...

The results are similar to what she's talking about in the TEDx Talk i.e. pro live vaccines such as measles, and anti non-live vaccines such as DTP, as DTP increases mortality rates.

"during six months of follow up mortality was 4% (9/245) for children who had already received diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and oral polio vaccines at least once and 3% (8/243) for children who had not received these vaccines. "

Firstly people need to wash their wounds correctly, that is the most important part. Next, DTP doesn't always protect you from tetanus, many people die of Tetanus who are up to date on jabs. Next thing is that only looking at one outcome is not sufficient to prove that a vaccine is beneficial to overall health, the jab is known to be regularly inducing asthma, and asthma kills people every day, so one has to weigh up the pros and cons. Unfortunately the non-live vaccines (that's the majority of vaccines in the schedule) are causing more harm than good, so something needs to change.

Yet the study you linked to found that the tetanus vaccine increases mortality rates. I would much rather avoid the jab, avoiding the risk of asthma and avoiding increased mortality risk, and just focus on cleaning wounds properly.

The context is freedom, and Australia not having enough freedom.

__________________