Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark
The reason they went and got him instead of asking him to come in is because he's a flight risk, and or concerns that he may have destroyed evidence.
|
False and false. He is NOT a flight risk. That's why the judge let him make bail with no money- because he's not a flight risk. And there was no evidence to destroy- they already have everything. Not only that but the NSA really does have every phone call, text, email, twitter message, whatever- they have it all. This is a political stunt to paint him as a criminal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark
While to you it may seem overkill to go and get a 60 year old man like this, but think about it carefully: He has alot to lose. He could go crazy, turn a gun on the FBI or on himself or his family. Getting him the way the FBI did was the right thing to do, considering his crimes, and considering his wealth.
|
His crimes? The accusation is that he testified to Congress and said something that wasn't accurate. Oh no, call SWAT! LOL. And his wealth? What are you talking about? He's broke from all the frivolous lawsuits. Your [fake] news sources are lying to you.