Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
This is not true at all. It's a matter of cost vs effectiveness. A wall around someone's house might cost $40k and would be very effective because wants to get in so bad that they are willing to tunnel under it. However, spending a trillion dollars on a wall where people will in fact tunnel under it wouldn't be effective or cost efficient at all.
We have walls, fences, and other barriers where people are most likely to cross.
|
If there is a wall 80% of immigrants would be forced to use points of entry. The other 20% the bad guys would be tunneling and trying to scale the wall. The border security could focus on that 20%
Of course they could not stop all illegals and drug smugglers but they most likely would get a decent handle on it.