Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
I have no doubt that the Dems are planning to use this as contrast if it doesn't either get a vote or doesn't pass the Senate. Net Neutrality is mostly a younger person's issue so they will want to use this as a way to motivate younger voters.
|
But... But... I'm old ! LOL
Those that are not for it (less the actual details of the legislation) do not understand how this will impact their lives.
I know I have given plenty of examples every time I hear those speaking against it and find they do not really understand it's impact to them directly or indirectly. Even those here that are suppose to be webmasters.
To much talk in generalities lead to miscommunication and misunderstanding of the facts and that bad/poor information spreads. It's a easy target for the large ISP's to attack and subdue.
In simple terms without details, you should just say that if you sell content that requires broadband, you could be limited against your major (richer) competitors as newer, more demanding bandwidth is required in future formats.
They do not want to clip the rate you now enjoy is correct when they say that.
This is about the future and future formats that compete with cable.
(not limited to) 4K, 8K + VR and other virtual formats.