Quote:
Originally Posted by notinmybackyard
You do know that if he obeys the subpoena he'll be breaking the law because he can't legally release the "unredacted" report.
Here's some advice:
What you need is a blowjob! Stop worrying about Trump and go get your cock sucked. It can be a woman, a man or you can smear bacon grease on your pecker and let the dog blow you. It doesn't matter what you chose just get a blow job and get your mind off of this bullshit conspiracy theory about Trump.
|
That's a bullshit argument being pushed by Fox news... talking heads...
The house committe can damn sure see the full report.. Barr can legally give it to them, he's attempting to abuse his power to say no. There is no law stopping him from handing over the full report right this minute... It 100% bullshit that he can't legally turn it over...
The rules that govern disclosures from the grand jury give the most authority to the Justice Department.
They outline how in several circumstances "an attorney for the government" can give grand jury information to help other criminal investigations and even share grand jury information with intelligence or national security officials if the matter involves foreign intelligence agencies.
So, under that part of the rule, if Congress needed secret parts of the Mueller report for intelligence considerations, Barr could choose to disclose those to members. No court needed there.
Under "the national security/foreign intelligence exception to grand jury secrecy, the attorney general can provide grand jury information to the chairs of the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees without asking for court permission," Ted Boutrous, a First Amendment litigator who recently asked a federal court for information in a grand jury case related to Mueller, wrote on Twitter Tuesday.