Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHungLo
I don't think it's contingent upon that. I've lost cases where there was never even a trademark and it was a generic name. They care more about your use of it over a period of time.
|
UDRP requires the complainant to have a valid trademark, which can be either a registered mark or a common law mark acquired through usage. However, in this case, Mark had a trademark and there's incontestable proof that he abandoned it.