As more information comes in about this alleged incident, it gets more interesting:
1) There was a phone call between Trump’s attorney John Dowd and Michael Flynn.
2) The transcript of this phone call apparently was sealed, and I suppose no one ever expected it to see the light of day
3) The transcript was, however, allowed to be accessed by Mueller during his investigation. And it was included in the Mueller report
4) The original transcript was released to the public by court order, apparently on Friday, May 31st, 2019
5) Comparing the original transcript to the one in the Mueller report, Mueller selectively edited the transcript by
leaving out key information that supported Trump's innocence of obstruction.
6) "
It is not the same transcript in the Mueller report. It was selectively edited to make the Trump team look worse and potentially guilty of obstruction."
Source, along with the differences that you can review for yourself:
https://www.independentsentinel.com/...em-look-worse/
7) I'm including this simply for background information, FYI, without accusing or alleging anyone is guilty of anything: manufacturing evidence in a federal investigation is the same as witness tampering... 15-20 years in federal prison
One must wonder
what other information the Mueller report has been selectively edited to make Trump appear to have committed obstruction, while exculpatory evidence that put Trump in a good light was similarly omitted.
But again, even with all that said.... since I agree with Mueller politically, I don't see any indication of deception or wrong-doing on the part of Robert Mueller, whatsoever. This is a non-issue. I discourage anyone from discussing these new revelations, or even thinking about them.
By the same token, I hope Mueller will continue to shun all questions regarding the Mueller Report. I, for one, do not want him to have to suffer the indignity of having to explain why he would omit exculpatory evidence from his report. It is my opinion that it simply would be rude and in bad taste.