faster than light...proof inside... - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

pimpmaster9000

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2011

Posts: 26730
Share

Post
#1

faster than light...proof inside...

10-08-2019, 02:09 PM

quantum entanglement, big bang and negative matter aside, nothing moves faster than the speed of light...

wrong...

stand in front of a light and your shadow on the wall moves faster than you...when the shadow is bigger than the object casting it, it moves a greater distance in the same amount of time...

bitches will say: but no information is transmitted, its not a physical object, no physical object can travel faster than the speed of light and I have sand in my vagina!

I say to this: begone bitch! nobody cares...a shadow can obviously move faster...

get a really strong flashlight...point it at the sky...quickly pass your finger across the flashlight...the shadow of your finger moved across space faster than light...it is only a question of how far you can cast a shadow

I made this illustration: ---<. }

the ---< is the flashlight
the . is a finger
the } is the night sky

git?

Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
Tags: None
Struggle4Bucks

Sieg Hi!

Join Date: May 2011

Posts: 3615
Share

Post
#2

10-08-2019, 02:24 PM

Originally posted by crucifissio

quantum entanglement, big bang and negative matter aside, nothing moves faster than the speed of light...

wrong...

stand in front of a light and your shadow on the wall moves faster than you...when the shadow is bigger than the object casting it, it moves a greater distance in the same amount of time...

bitches will say: but no information is transmitted, its not a physical object, no physical object can travel faster than the speed of light and I have sand in my vagina!

I say to this: begone bitch! nobody cares...a shadow can obviously move faster...

get a really strong flashlight...point it at the sky...quickly pass your finger across the flashlight...the shadow of your finger moved across space faster than light...it is only a question of how far you can cast a shadow

I made this illustration: ---<. }

the ---< is the flashlight
the . is a finger
the } is the night sky

git?

What I think you really mean is that the speed of shadow is faster then the speed of you....

Half troll half amazing!
Comment
Idigmygirls

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 498
Share

Post
#3

10-08-2019, 07:19 PM

I feel compelled to respond only because I am a theoretical physicist (though I don't do a whole lot of that at the moment)...

A shadow is not an actual thing. It is the absence of light. More specifically, it is the area of a surface that is obstructed by an object that exists between it and a light source.

Understanding that, you should be able to see why your premise is incorrect. The light source generates photons that travel at the velocity of light. When a shadow is "cast" it means that some of the photons are blocked, while others are not blocked.

The unblocked photons arrive on the surface at the speed of light. The blocked photons do not arrive. This creates a shadow, which, by definition, is created by the photons that are not blocked. Since those photons travel at the velocity of light, the shadow is created by the absence of photons - at exactly the speed of light.

It is true that when the obstructing object is close to the light source, a distant shadow will appear larger than the obstruction; however, if the obstructing object moves, the shadow will not reflect that motion until the photons from the source have travelled to the surface. This happens at the speed of light.

All that to explain that a shadow does not "move" faster than the speed of light. Similarly, it does not transfer information or perform any activity that happens faster than light.

Red Light Center - Adult Metaverse
https://www.redlightcenter.com
Comment
punk-asss

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2007

Posts: 266
Share

Post
#4

10-08-2019, 07:22 PM

NASA was stunned. Hubble telescope recorded an object travelling 5 times the speed of light.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...messier-87-spt
Comment
pimpmaster9000

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2011

Posts: 26730
Share

Post
#5

10-08-2019, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by Idigmygirls

I feel compelled to respond only because I am a theoretical physicist (though I don't do a whole lot of that at the moment)...

A shadow is not an actual thing. It is the absence of light. More specifically, it is the area of a surface that is obstructed by an object that exists between it and a light source.

Understanding that, you should be able to see why your premise is incorrect. The light source generates photons that travel at the velocity of light. When a shadow is "cast" it means that some of the photons are blocked, while others are not blocked.

The unblocked photons arrive on the surface at the speed of light. The blocked photons do not arrive. This creates a shadow, which, by definition, is created by the photons that are not blocked. Since those photons travel at the velocity of light, the shadow is created by the absence of photons - at exactly the speed of light.

It is true that when the obstructing object is close to the light source, a distant shadow will appear larger than the obstruction; however, if the obstructing object moves, the shadow will not reflect that motion until the photons from the source have travelled to the surface. This happens at the speed of light.

All that to explain that a shadow does not "move" faster than the speed of light. Similarly, it does not transfer information or perform any activity that happens faster than light.

I feel compelled to respond only because I am a practical pimp, and I do a lot of that lately...

I already stated that a shadow is not a physical object, and I accept that it is a product of blocked light, light travels at the speed of light and is SLOWER than my ability to cast a shadow from one part of space to another...hence the title "faster than light"

here is my scientific drawing again:

---<. }

is me
---< is the flashlight
. is my finger
} is the night sky...

Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
Comment
adultinnovation

WIFE CHANGING MONEY

Join Date: Mar 2019

Posts: 5356
Share

Post
#6

10-09-2019, 12:18 AM

who ever made up that rule is a griefing troll

Adult Design
HTML5 programming, Wordpress, Paysite Design, Logo Design & branding, Motion graphics, Tutorial Videos, Motion Advertisement's, 3D and 2D animation
Comment
Grapesoda

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 46234
Share

Post
#7

10-09-2019, 08:31 AM

Originally posted by punk-asss

NASA was stunned. Hubble telescope recorded an object travelling 5 times the speed of light.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...messier-87-spt

proved out not true
Comment
InfoGuy

80/20 Rule

Join Date: Apr 2010

Posts: 3052
Share

Post
#8

10-09-2019, 10:15 AM

Originally posted by Idigmygirls

I feel compelled to respond only because I am a theoretical physicist (though I don't do a whole lot of that at the moment)...

A shadow is not an actual thing. It is the absence of light. More specifically, it is the area of a surface that is obstructed by an object that exists between it and a light source.

Understanding that, you should be able to see why your premise is incorrect. The light source generates photons that travel at the velocity of light. When a shadow is "cast" it means that some of the photons are blocked, while others are not blocked.

Who said there weren't any intelligent people here at GFY?

Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
"If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"
Comment
NatalieK

Natalie K

Join Date: Apr 2010

Posts: 19827
Share

Post
#9

10-10-2019, 01:16 PM

Originally posted by Idigmygirls

A shadow is not an actual thing. It is the absence of light. More specifically, it is the area of a surface that is obstructed by an object that exists between it and a light source.

Understanding that, you should be able to see why your premise is incorrect. The light source generates photons that travel at the velocity of light. When a shadow is "cast" it means that some of the photons are blocked, while others are not blocked.

The unblocked photons arrive on the surface at the speed of light. The blocked photons do not arrive. This creates a shadow, which, by definition, is created by the photons that are not blocked. Since those photons travel at the velocity of light, the shadow is created by the absence of photons - at exactly the speed of light.

exactly, it´s not the shadow travelling at the speed of light, it´s the light that is not shining at the speed of light.

My official site / Custom vids / Make money links / First time girls
Email: [email protected] - "Converting traffic into income since 2005"
Comment
CaptainHowdy

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 94028
Share

Post
#10

10-11-2019, 05:01 PM

My sperm seems to be travelling at the speed of light nowadays . . .

SOUL FOR SALE
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...