Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
If you're going to spend that much on a camera you must know what you're doing.
Do you know what you're doing with a camera? Then there's a good excuse for elevating to 4K. But never assume 4K is going to make a bad shooter good or a bad movie good. Never assume that only good shooters can buy a 4K camera.
What's the hardest and more vital thing to acquire? The skills to shoot videos good enough for Pfizer or the buying of a 4K camera?after all you said $1300 is all it takes to get a 4K camera. Even $3,000 won't be a problem. It takes years to acquire the skills to shoot properly, therefore it's primary and the camera is secondary. Which is where I started.
So keep arguing the camera is the more important and the only reason Pfizer come to you for the $250k is you have a good camera. Because if you disagree with that you have to agree with me.
|
If i read you I really donīt understand how you could ever make a step without stumbling.
if someone say: DO YOU WANT TO BUY A WHITE CABRIOLET?
the answer is simply YES OR NO and the details come later.
but you answer this question with:
nobody needs a cabriolet OR
I doubt that the one who offers it is able to make a cabriolet OR
they should not produce cabriolets but bicycles because they sell better OR
you are too late I was the only one that ever produced cabriolets - in fact they were bicycles but I called them cabriolet - anyway you are TOO late because I am retired now....
what a fuck is that?
do you sometimes read what you write ?