|
Traffic versus Content, which one is King?
It's been a 20 year debate that needs resolving. So here goes.
Who here pushes sites with crap content? Sites with ugly girls, faking it, being fucked by ugly guys with small to average dicks.
Who submitted TGPs full of shit content and got them listed on the top sites. Who gets there videos listed on Pornhub and get consistent high scores from surfers. Who here knows or has sites that can afford to just pay for adverts because they convert enough traffic?
The difficult is always going to get better results than the easy, for the individual who can do both. And there is the problem. Few can shoot good porn, very few can shoot great porn especially today when money for content is limited for most.
It's easy to put up a site with 30 scenes costing $300 each. It's hard to find, new attractive modes, shoot, in a new location every time, a good scene requiring the knowledge and skills to create good porn.
What's good porn? The porn that converts the most traffic. Gets the most affiliates, the most traffic to a sample, the most clicks from the sample to the tour, the tour that converts the most surfers into members, the site that retains the best. The site that makes the most money.
If you disagree show us the shit porn sites that are doing great and you are pushing traffic to.
|