Quote:
Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
Jesus fucking Christ. I cannot stand this chicken versus egg nonsense. It should be obvious that the value lies no more in one than the other. Without traffic, content is fucking useless. Without content, traffic is pointless.
The real argument isn't which is king -- it's which one is more difficult to create. Site owners can purchase content all day long - and cheaply. Even shit content can sell. As many have argued, nearly brain dead Instagram girls with $100 phones can make money. No artistry, no talent, no expensive lighting - merely a splendid body that I guy like me can only dream of tasting. Creating traffic, on the other hand, ESPECIALLY TODAY, is a motherfucking ballbusting skill.
|
Why is it a ball busting skill? Because surfers prefer getting free better content than what you're trying to sell them. If anything Tubes have proven Content is King.
Is it hard to start a Tube site, get traffic to it? Dead easy. The problem is in getting enough content to get enough traffic to get a conversion. Without 50,000 clips everyone else hasn't got, of a decent length, few surfers will come back, bookmark or remember. It's no good having a site that relies on Tube submitters and Google for traffic. You must have loyal visitors.
As for purchasing it. Go and find 50,000 videos that everyone else doesn't have and see how cheap they are.
Yes it's easy to shoot porn today and the quality of the girls performance is what determines how much money she makes.
You are right one is useless without the other.