Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWENSON
Sure, I just mean that Paul has for years gone "it's converting 1 in 1000 which is terrible!!!!!!!!!!" but he's using other peoples numbers because he has none.
My iFriends ratio was 1:12 for a long time. Chaturbate might be 1:3000 if I use embeds that aren't super targeted on the side of 50k videos. Those first click popups and everything else get factored into the ratios he's using.
And he also brings up 'it takes 5000 video viewers to get _________' but of course it does. Banners have never gotten clicked on like a text link that is part of your own site content and promotion. He's comparing apples to pet rocks.
|
the point is that paul does not even know the difference between an impression and a click and he does not know the difference between a click from a fake banner that is used on CPM to catch as much clicks as possible and a click that comes from a banner that promotes the product.
he also donīt understand that there is nothing like a clickprice because a click on an early impression is always more expensive as a click on a late impression.
I havenīt seen conv rates on 1:5000 in my life - not even on pops.
traffic with such a conversion rate would be sold so cheap that nobody can live from it and the traffic that is made just with the advertising would cost more than the result can be.
and this is why a member porn site can not pay 0,20-0,25 for a single click. because they convert not better than 1:500 or less. and thatīs why other products can pay even more for a single click because they convert better and have a much higher lifetime revenue.
i donīt know why this is so hard to understand for paul that things are automatically move to where they make more.
I have webmasters in my network that have been happy 10 years ago to make 10-15 k with affiliate marketing.
now they leave this for that ones who know what they are do and the same publishers make 50, 60 or 70 k per month because they spend all their time in traffic generation and establishing more sites.