View Single Post
Old 01-07-2020, 04:17 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by wankawonk View Post
The girls don't need you or me or anyone else for marketing. The smart/attractive ones make fantastic money doing it completely by themselves.

That's the way it is in the social media era. Adapt or die.

First y'all hated tubes for giving away your content for free...now y'all hate the girls for monetizing their content on their own. Welcome to life.
Solo girl content, two girl and boy-girl content shot with models who can perform for real, project their unique personality, tease a titillate the viewer while sharing their orgasms has been popular for 40 years. Because I was shooting it in the late 70s.

I had a catalogue of 100s of girls of such content and made a lot of money with it. The problem is most girls clam up in front of a camera or adopt a fake image. Being smart and attractive isn't enough, she has to be a bit slutty (for want of a better word). Because fucking the viewer is essential while she fucks herself or partners.

That's what the viewer wants, the fantasy that she would fuck him if he were there. I shot some average looking and intelligent girls back in the day who were winners because they wanted to be fucked and made it plain to everyone.

Is there a place for a site like that today?

Giving girls a platform to sell their work on is something few girls can manage. Shooting it properly is another problem most girls have. Getting the right atmosphere for the scene. Building different scenarios. Getting different partners.

The problem is revenue. Is there enough money in it to support such an operation? I suggest not because if there were solo girl sites would be making enough to support this type of operation.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote