I am not sure if it was for me but if it was:
Let's not assume that I send non-profittabe traffic. I am a social media influencer with ~60 million impressions per month on Twitter with 1 of my several accounts. I also have websites with decent SEO that have model/pornstars profiles.
Daily I receive messages from models who want me to promote their onlyfans account.
It is not PPL, it is revshare if my traffic was not converting then they don't have to pay anything.
Secondly I don't believe I have a god given right to a program. The company can reject my application by saying just that: your traffic is not profitable or whatever instead of asking me to complete optional fields on my profile.
In any case, communication is the problem here: they silently changed the requirements for being an affiliate, even for existing ones. Blocking access to lifetime existing referrals is nothing less than shaving. But let's give them the benefits of the doubts, I have reapplied yet again to see if my profile will be approved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Let me educate you for a little while because reading this thread confused me. Affiliates have no god-given right to a program. They have no god-given right to anything until they send profitable traffic that no one else can send.
They also have to send traffic models to want to perform to. They have to send enough traffic to warrant the commission rates. Finally, the company has to want to pay out commission.
At 50% and upwards how long did you think it would before large companies started to weed out the smaller guys?
How long before companies said we would be better off paying out less or even nothing at all to affiliates?
This is the way all businesses are run. You send them traffic because they are the best for you, they accept your traffic because you are best for them. You or they can leave when they like.
|