Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFurry
In my opinion, for a porn contract to say that videos will be on the internet, that's perfectly normal and expected, and they can't attack that.
But if they find that they told some girls they were signing a contract for a non-nude modeling job, ushered the girls to sign it quickly without reading, and used the "refusal to shoot results in a big fine" part to blackmail them into getting nude, it won't hold up in my opinion.
And this is how it went according to the article, as I understood. With all that said, I also hope it's not true.
|
Yes, if that is what they were doing then they are in a lot of trouble and deserve to be.
It's clear that they were responding to nude modelling ads though, or at least in the initial filmed interviews they often say why they want to get into nude modelling etc. They often also say (rather convincingly compared to most 'casting sites') that that is their limit and they don't want to do hardcore. Then a couple of minutes later they are sucking the photographer's cock while he holds his camera in their face.
Still, I've watched quite a few of their videos and I've never seen one where the girl looks 'blackmailed' or upset.