So let's go positive.
What the video assumes is Snapchat, OnlyFans etc get as much traffic as Pornhub, Xhamster etc. We all know that's wrong. Even if both were free or paid for there's still a very sizeable that doesn't want solo girl, two girl, BG camera on a tripod porn. Stats tell us a lot of people want authentic, well shot, directed porn be it Amateur or Penthouse. Don't be fooled that anyone can create good porn.
SC, OF get a % of the audience.
Girls are supposed to be making high 4,5, 6 figure incomes monthly. Don't tell me it's because they get the traffic. All the traffic in the world won't convince enough enough buyers to buy shit when better is on offer. It's because the content is good enough to convert, retain and return customers. Good or bad content is a combination of model and shooter working together.
So how many of these 5 and 6 figure girls can elevate themselves up a notch by getting a professional to shoot them? Not saying that girls with a camera on a tripod won't work, I'm saying that's what 95% offer. If a model wants to be in the top 5% she needs to offer something different. Better lit Amateur or Penthouse, no shadows over the action, better angles and posed, better cropped, better length. A professional shooter can and will offer all that.
Yes girls offer a better experience, happier performers make better porn, fans get to think they know them and girls will put in a better performance than what they did for some shooter paying minimum and rushing them through the work. Shooters who accepted that were crap. Why didn't sites offer the same, it's no secret fans love seeing models in real life.
So why have so few professionals shooters entered the market, why do so few girls get a professional? Same amount of promoting, same way of promoting, just tapping into a different market than the other 95%. Which is clearly a big market as Tubes prove.
|