The OP did get in contact with me. In writing he has walked me through a timeline of events as they relate to the money, the merchant that provided it, and his active/inactive "relationship" with PAXUM. On the surface it appears that he may be justified in seeking the return of the monies.
We have all heard the saying, "there are two sides to every story". The lawyers that I am surrounded with remind me, sometimes they are more than two sides or perspectives on what exactly has transpired.
Hopefully, in the upcoming days, the OP will resubmit his communication to PAXUM, which I will help draft, and they will reconsider their current position, and refund the monies requested. It is not necessary for PAXUM to admit fault or responsibility. It's enough it they can see the clients perspective on what really transpired, and in the name of "customer service", push the refund.
__________________
"The time men spend in trying to impress others they could spend in doing the things by which others would be impressed."
|