Quote:
Originally Posted by MakeMeGrrrrowl
"The complaint claims that as early as 2009, "and definitely by fall 2016," Mindgeek knew Girls Do Porn was coercing and intimidating models into having sex on camera. It also places much of the blame for the victims' harm on Mindgeek, presenting several claims from models themselves that Pornhub failed to take down videos, even when they reported the videos to Pornhub and pleaded with the company to remove them."
Doesn't seem that these women were given the same respect. How do you feel knowing what you know now after reading the lawsuit claims?
I wouldn't support them.
|
40 Girls Do Porn Victims Are Suing Pornhub for $1 Million Each
Quote:
One of the Jane Doe plaintiffs alleges that she contacted Pornhub through its video takedown portal. "Im going to kill myself if this stays up here," she claims to have written in that portal. "I was scammed and told this was only going to be on dvds in another country. Please im begging you please ill pay!" Days later, she wrote to Tube8, another Mindgeek site: "They scammed me and told me it was only going to dvds in another country. Please this is ruining my life."
A year later, with the video still up on Pornhub, the complaint claims she wrote again to the platform:
|
At least one woman allegedly offered money and her removal request was still denied. Discovery will likely show many more instances of studios getting preferential treatment over victims with regards to content removal.