View Single Post
Old 12-19-2020, 10:29 PM  
SpicyM
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfoGuy View Post
The bill says "every individual appearing" and not "every individual performing". This bill would include any civilians appearing in the background of videos shot in public places such as in many of the reality porn shoots, spectators at Public Disgrace or Party Hardcore who are clothed and not having sex and any non-performing production people who appear in videos.
You can't even capture random persons without their consent and publish that. That is prohibited in many European countries with some exceptions for press, tv, art works etc. - it falls under personality and privacy protection. A photograph where a person can be recognized = personal data.

I doubt random people on the street would be happy to be included in a porn shoot against their will... And Party Hardcore is staged of course.

All these site operators (especially those with voyeur sites) risk hefty fines regardless of this bill. Local TV news often blur faces of persons captured in their reports if they ask them ... and that is not even close to porn shared on porn tubes visited by millions of people every day.

Real voyeur content is illegal, at several levels.
__________________
no sig, sorry
SpicyM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote