Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman!
What about the 20% of models that will take your shit and go camming somewhere else ?
Not many people will bother trying to sue someone over $900 not worth the effort.
|
Very good question,and indeed it happens for some of them to try 'scamming' ,but only in something like 12.5%-15% cases not 20% .
By now not one of them managed to go as far as getting the 'steal' ,mostly because everything is sent gradually,even the details and advices and there are a lot of requests based on identification in which the 'bad seeds' are refusing to continue,most of them don't even get to sign the contract with the studio .
Yet the most important factor seems to be that of financial perspective,because most of them are in a poor financial situation,only something like 1/10 have or are able to get the necessary PC( one meeting the requirements),thus they prefer to be correct and get a stable income that'd get them out of the bad situation.
Those that manage to 'scam' get as far as getting all the professional indications and some hidden tips which are very good at increasing the results,but without a certain software that artificially increases the number of viewers,most of them get to have modest results because of the very high competition .Some of those likely continue doing it on their own in spite of modest results,and some of them even try contacting again from another number ,either to try getting the software,which is impossible as it's not being given to no one,only the studio keeps it ,or they supposedly try being correct this time but are refused immediately as the studio already has their details from the previous conversation.
Another answer I've gotten regarding your question is that,in the presumed event in which one of them would manage to get the steal,regarding the equipment, the studio will either refund you or it will assign(preferably from their point of view,but it's your decision) you another model.
Everything is based on math as the ROI(not including taxes) divided by the risk(of that attempt by the models,not even talking about the fact that for a successful attempt the risk is much lower) is higher than 30x ,which means that by far the best decision is for the studio to take the risk for the financer ,thus ensuring a long-term collaboration and financing,which is the only thing they need.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaner
Sounds legit mr. Seodestroy sir
|
Everyone that has done business with me knows that everything I say is accurate and everything is easy to be proven.I'm looking forward to hearing legit questions from everyone,but you should at least read the details,and I'll point out the most important fact regarding your statement :
"while obviously mentioning that the growth is limited by the number of models" so,as everybody with a brain can figure out,it's not possible to apply it 'an infinite' of times,repeating the ROI infinitely thus getting 'infinite $s'
From what I observed you are some sort of a clown,and even worse, from what I observed in a thread about Ross when he got scammed, you were supporting the scammer instead of support the man that got scammed,who is a serious guy..
Pointing out towards the thread in which you were unruly towards a girl and her data on this forum also proves that you're not a man.
This thread is for normal and moral people,so please have a little bit of decency and ignore it. Try getting attention from other people, I don't like clowns.
P.S. : I already reported you for associating me with such people,who are the likes of yours and your education. And as I said before,if you can put 10k$ where your mouth is standing,I'm more than happy to continue discussing even with a clown like you.