Originally Posted by dcortez

Actually, on closer examination, what does this mean?



The record seems to suggest that the perjury Fuhrman was convicted of was for lying about using the "N" word - ie. he lied about "being a racist" - if one assumes, as I believe Ito did, that using that racial epithet is a racist act.

So he was a racist.

He lied about his acts of racism.

He was convicted, charged and fined about lying about his racist actions.

Does that not equate to "he was convicted of lying about being a racist", which made him a "convicted racist liar".

Am I missing something here?