Quote:
Originally Posted by RycEric
It's the case law that's relevant. Sorry to confuse you  |
I wasn't confused. That's the text from someone lobbying for that amendment to be added speaking to the Judiciary Committee. In other words, it's very cherry picked by a lobbyist being paid to sway an opinion. The amendment never made it out of the Judiciary Committee (
https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-...2560+%28108%29)
If those cherry picked cases were relevant, then there's a lot of big, US based sites with very competent counsel who'd be operating very differently.