06-20-2021, 04:25 PM
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,802
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RycEric
Fixed..
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-480.ZS.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/464/417
"One who knowingly induces, causes or materially contributes to copyright infringement, by another but who has not committed or participated in the infringing acts him or herself, may be held liable as a contributory infringer if he or she had knowledge, or reason to know, of the infringement. See, e.g., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005); Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)."
|
Awesome. I don't really care or have a dog in the fight - I was just pointing out that you simply linked to what amounts to nothing more than text from a lobbyist originally. You seem to be just wanting to poke at ThePornDude. Enjoy. 
|
|
|