View Single Post
Old 06-20-2021, 04:25 PM  
trevesty
Confirmed User
 
trevesty's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by RycEric View Post
Fixed..
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-480.ZS.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/464/417
"One who knowingly induces, causes or materially contributes to copyright infringement, by another but who has not committed or participated in the infringing acts him or herself, may be held liable as a contributory infringer if he or she had knowledge, or reason to know, of the infringement. See, e.g., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005); Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)."
Awesome. I don't really care or have a dog in the fight - I was just pointing out that you simply linked to what amounts to nothing more than text from a lobbyist originally. You seem to be just wanting to poke at ThePornDude. Enjoy.
trevesty is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook