Quote:
Originally Posted by NALEM
The Porn Nerd, attacking Gary or his wife with insults against his wife reflects very poorly on you. It makes you appear to be lacking of education or class, or possibly both.
Proper documentation of every single model that appears in a scene is something responsible "long term" business minded folks should have. Managed correctly it protects the rightful owners of the content, which may or may not include the models themselves.
Entrusting the records to C4S or any other hosting / distribution platform is a separate matter to be debated, without throwing insults around.
|
You do you know WHY I call her Gary? Hmm? Perhaps do some research as to why people have been banned and then post AS their slag wife with drunken, self-aggrandizing and judgmental contributions. (Sorry, words too big? I am so uneducated after all.)
Plus they are mostly ex-pat twits.
Again (and again?) this is not about proper record keeping. This is about
:
A. Focusing on the KEEPING part (as in, WHO gets to "keep" sensitive, private and personal data).
B. WHY submit model IDs when that is not Mastercard's requirements.
C. If older content was once compliant it should be grandfathered in (except grandpa porn, that is gross).
D. Besides the above, how (in practical terms) would any of this be verified? Who does the verifying (see point A)? So who then takes responsibility for the 2257 info? Both parties (C4S and the uploader)? Doesn't that open up liability issues for C4S? Why would they want that? Why not just direct MC back to the, you know, 2257 record keeper (the producer)?
What about storage of data? Are they going to manually verify every ID/clip? Like Age Verification the Goal is probably a good one but the implementation is simply unworkable.