Quote:
Originally Posted by SpicyM
I don't live in a third world, unless you call European Union (the place where most Americanese shoot these days) a third world... that just shows your arrogance. MC has nothing to do with my agreements (even you stated that "Mastercard doesn't care about your model release") and since this is the second post I try to explain that to you I doubt you are a lawyer - or maybe you are just unable to pull your head out of your ass. 
My point was that producers can easily deter models from filling these take-downs if they have agreements protecting them from damages. Models asking to have their (legally shot, published and sold) content removed from a paysite cause a damage to creators/producers/paysite operators.
BTW, I had a (real) lawyer create my papers , so kindly fuck off you arrogant asshole. |
I would heed his advice as gospel if I were you.
I'm not saying that only because he's an attorney, but because he is telling you the actual outcome of your great idea.
Yes, you can try and deter them from knowing their rights as human beings, but that doesn't mean that any court of law would care about your agreement. Not only because the models would believe that they have no legal recourse (through fear), but because it could also create a scenario where they believe they have no way out, period.
Put simply, your agreement wouldn't work out the way you think it would in today's society.
Everyone has a right to be forgotten, and just because you paid someone $1,000 - $2,500 for a scene doesn't mean that you can hold it over their head infinitely, and that you can call it a "whore's regret" when push comes to shove.
Try to think of it rationally, and not in a literal sense. You're dealing with actual human beings, with souls. If you honestly believe that you can buy someone's dignity, and expect yourself to be able to market their naked bodies even if they don't consent anymore, then there is honestly something wrong with your way of thinking, and that's something for you to figure out.