Quote:
Originally Posted by pornguy
I think the point PornLaw is trying to get across is very simple.
MC will pull your ability to use their cards.
It is HIGHLY likely that Visa will then do the same. If You dont process yourself then people using your content will be in that position. Regardless of the paper work you have the girls/guys sign.
Kind of sounds like MC is creating a way for a model to get paid and then order a take down right away and hardly have her images spread anywhere and there is little to nothing creators can do about it.
|
You didn't read my posts, did you?
I wrote, that you can prevent models from issuing these take-downs by signing agreements with them (prior to the shoot) ,that prohibit that. If I insert a clause into my agreement that sets a fine of 2000€ for these take-downs (which are against the consent to have the content published and distributed with no limitations, which is a part of the agreement) then I can deter the models from doing so... As long as the agreements are legal.
It has nothing to do with MC and their requirements ... jesus...
It's the models that use the form to take down their content, not MC.
Is there a law that allows models to issue take-downs if they had previously (and legally) agreed to have their content shot, edited, distributed, sold and/or published on internet? No, not here.
The only legal way for them would be to have a court make the agreement void.