Quote:
Originally Posted by NatalieK
look at you trying to be all diplomatic... 
why not just say "the police to charge" or "a police officer", but then this would narrow the point to officers and not others like police sergeants or inspectors 
anyway, as long as it doesnīt obstruct our Currently poo loverīs vision, should be alright.
this is wrong |
Gary, you seem to be giving him legal advise.
As such, you could be open to being sued for compensation, if he is stopped and charged by the police. Or indeed anyone is.
It is very brave of you to give legal advise when your not legally trained to.
Sorry, I have no idea what this means. I have read it a few times Gary, but it seems to just be nonsense. Perhaps in your head it sounded clever.
Quote:
|
why not just say "the police to charge" or "a police officer", but then this would narrow the point to officers and not others like police sergeants or inspectors
|