Thread: Tech RIP adult biz
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2023, 08:31 AM  
lockept93
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZTT View Post
Excuse the following novel, but I'm actually pretty mind-blown by just how much money is involved here, considering it's early days and a relatively small simple site producing worthless pictures, and in how much potential porn AIs have the more I think about it.

I mean if you ever rued the switchover from fat hairy bellies, mustaches and sideburns to plastic tits, hairspray and bleach, you could relive the glory days of porn with AIs from companies with 60s and 70s archives.

With training on material from a particular porn star, users could create more of that model, to their heart's content.

You could put 21st century pornstars into 1970s settings, or vice versa.

(All with official approval and royalties duly paid to the models, of course, because ethics, apart from being the right thing to do, is also the smart thing in today's social media world).

Any porn star, genre, type, 60s, 70s, hard, soft, medium, rare can be re/created. When video AI is more established, cam models could train AIs on all the recordings of themselves out there and retire, with their fans having an endless supply of content they get to direct.

One thing content owners should not make the mistake of doing is trying to produce their own 'new' material from old and trying to sell it. That's dinosaur thinking.

The fun and attraction of porn AIs, as Pornpen shows, is users having the freedom to create their own stuff the way they want it. For most it's probably not even about making something to jack off over, but just messing around, or a creative/artistic exercise.

If I was a CEO at Big Porn, with a lot of content in the vaults, I'd already be on the phone to Pornpen to talk about licensing or otherwise using the tech, preferably exclusively, the way Microsoft did with ChatGPT.

(And I'd definitely give whoever posted such an idea in forum at least 10% of such a deal.)
The reason for this "chaos" is that these technologies are based on open source - so you can train your own AI models, you can train your own AI writing. In the past new technologies are hold by tech firms and the ways they expand are more or less under control. The current AI situation is like someone opened the pandoras box and whithin one year so many different markets get infected without having proper time to prepare for that and need make fast heavy decisions. Look at Artstation, their whole userbase gets riot cause AI images are flooding the market - users force them to ban AI but as big company u don't want close yourself out of new technologies and markets and u see your competitors go with it.

Yes the main reason for the rise is the user experience to make something own - nobody is on the point yet to say, AI images are better than real ones - but the feeling to do not NEED someone else to "produce" something with boobies you can watch - that's a form of getting "power". It's abstract yes. I also believe it's a lot of hype now where everyone want try it and it makes just fun and its something new. Also this hype will be gone and then it will be a normal tool.
lockept93 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote