Quote:
Originally Posted by fastball
Who would have guessed?
|
That was actually intended more as a hypothetical question about the reverse conclusion.
Whether the banning of content by national courts, against foreign servers and content providers,
conversely, allows content to be shown on the foreign server that is questionable at the server location and company headquarters.
The type of content (porn, gambling, drugs, weapons, same-sex relationships, hate speak, defamation)
and country constellation can be exchanged arbitrarily for this question.
Who is the next, a Saudi to sue Pornhub for gay porn because homosexuality is criminalized in Saudi Arabia?
A Thai guy suing Youtube for deleting his hash channel but cannabis is not illegal in Thailand?
A desi husband sues Youporn because indian law allows him to show his wife naked where he wants?
Greetings Beaver