Quote:
Originally Posted by plsureking
am i the only one who thinks AI art looks like shit?
|
No, it's garbage, but no more than 'cartoon porn' or tradition CGI porn, and the people who like that stuff are presumably the people who'll love AI porn too. Also furries and people into 'fantasy' or weird stuff that's not catered to much by standard porn.
It's not even that AI porn looks shit - I mean it looks good for computer generated imagery - it all just looks and feels the same; completely soulless.
Most 'real' porn is also trash, but even the worst of it still has a feeling or depth or physicality you can instinctively sense and relate to on some level, along with at least a nominal amount of artistic merit; and some degree of effort and creativity has gone into even the worst porn.
There's none of that with AI porn because there's literally nothing at all to it. It's just a grid of pixels arranged by computer software based on patterns fed into it.
People seriously talk about 'creating' AI images and it's a joke.
It's like saying you 'created' a page of results on Google.
As I think I've said before, there's no commercial value in AI porn images, unless you can make a unique and interesting 'character' that catches on with people (this requires effort and creativity), or AI versions of real models, past or present, with an existing fanbase.
The real advantage of AIs, and where the real money's at, is enabling people to create their own personalized porn, tailored to exactly what they're into.