Quote:
Originally Posted by jscott
Morally based decent people refuse to follow your far (extreme) left narratives. I get it, you hate anyone who goes against or questions the regime, but some of us dislike fascism and socialism. 
What evidence have you seen or heard that leads you to believe he should be deemed guilty?
None, they have none, you have not seen or heard any. You automatically deem him guilty because you adopt the same opinion as the Far Left media like MSNBC, BBC, etc.
Have you listened to any full interviews with him instead of 30 sec clips?
Again, you ignorant radicals refuse to create your own opinion based on your own research. You're lazy & biased. |
You're confusing me for yourself. I said "What happens if he loses trial and gets found guilty?". What part of that says I automatically deem him guilty?
Yet you're here automatically deeming him innocent, before trial. And coming up with all kinds of dumb ass wacky political conspiracies to justify your radical shenanigans... like there ain't a shit ton of other alpha youtube hustlers doing just fine, and somehow Tate is some super target needed to be silenced over some fake shit... for what?
That's the problem with you rightards. Never learn your lessons. Yall used the same exact play for Trump, then he was found liable for sexual abuse... and is now charged with 37 federal felonies
