Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
And if so, what's the issue with that?
Do you genuinely believe that paying a one-time lump sum for someone's explicit pictures and videos grants you a lifetime irrevocable license from a moral standpoint?
Should someone challenge this in the court of law, you would lose.
You can't compare pornography to a motion picture or something similar. Porn is porn, and if you believe that it isn't, then let someone take explicit pictures and videos of you in every imaginable pose for $500 - $1000 (or maybe a bit more) and then try not to complain after you realize that the deal is completely one-sided and that you've been had.
Pornography doesn't have to be predatory, but it generally is. That's why a lot of lawmakers want to ban porn, not because they want to infringe on someone's freedom of speech.
|
An interesting take.
I disagree with you, and do you have a time limit? I mean lets say you shoot a model and do a lot of content. And the next day you start a site with her content, but she wants it removed.
Do you remove it and just think, oh well, it only cost me $100k.
In that case will not all models shoots then get paid, then demand it is removed.
What if I shoot a model for her site and she asks me to do lesbian shoots and I arrange it. But the model then wants it removed. So not only have I paid a model for the shoot, but then the other model sues me because she cannot have that content on her site.
But then again, what stops you going to prison for hosting the content, simply because she complains to the police and has never contacted you.