Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
If you shot thousands of pictures and 50-100 scenes, then it could be very easily claimed that you were business partners, and that the talent wasn't duped as much as a one-time performer, or someone who did a couple of scenes.
You would likely be sued for a better percentage in the former scenario, but in the latter scenario, you would be sued for damages and for content removal.
Context matters, because:
1. Have you paid her (or him) a lump sum?
2. Is the content vanilla, or is it something very extreme, or shameful?
3. Can you prove how much you made off of her (or his) content?
If it cost you approximately $2000 to shoot a scene, and most of your members tuned in to watch that particular scene, then you could argue that you paid very little, but gained quite a lot.
You can't go to prison for something like that, it would be a civil matter entirely.
This law is to do with something criminal, i.e. publishing someone's images or videos without their consent, or creating fake explicit pictures, etc. which should land you in prison regardless.
|
Also with respect, you seem now to have gone from a model has the right to have you remove content, to a model has the right to have you remove content under certain circumstances.
Something that sounds like going to court and both sides spending thousands and thousands on putting forward a legal argument.
As for deep fake, I suspect in time AI content may be included.