Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
The difference being is that the girl (or the guy) who shot a couple of scenes altogether probably suffer from poor decision making or have an addiction. It's your job not to shoot people like that, and instead shoot someone who has a kink for it, or wants that type of fame.
Someone with whom you had shot a 100 scenes, they probably aren't being paid by scene, and it's a solo girl site, or something similar. Therefore, a partnership.
Trouble being that most of them wouldn't do it if they didn't have to, and are often lied to or coerced into doing more than was agreed upon in order to make the scene feel more authentic for the viewer, and if they could, they would take their ass to court, or even something more. But as long as they prey on the vulnerable, they will be fine.
Well, let's test the shame theory... spread your old ass cheeks for me, and let me create a couple of videos of you being fisted, with your face in it.. and let's see if you think it's a matter of debate? You are laughable sometimes... throw your "but she signed a contract" mumbo jumbo to someone else. Fact of the matter is that nothing in this world gives you irrevocable lifetime rights to someone's explicit pictures if you're the only person and/or entity stopping them from leading a normal private life.
If we're talking someone like Mia Khalifa, then it simply wouldn't be possible to remove that much content due to how high profile she is, and besides, she does OnlyFans regardless. So in her case, it's not like she's trying to have a quiet normal life... but for a lot of girls and guys, it's a company or two limiting them from leading a private life like that porn site purveyor has.  |
I'm not sure how long you've been in the industry or what exactly you do but you've made some erroneous claims regarding models and producers - even the law.
In your statement above you assert (NOTE not my opinion but yours)
1) models generally mentally can't make a decision or have an addiction
2) the producers job is to find someone with that kink required in the scene
3) the general rule of thumb are not paid by scene
4) Most models would not be doing porn at all if they had the choice
5) Most producers lie/coerce the model to get the scene
6) The adult industry preys on girls and there is nothing set up to help the girls
7) Shame is not relative but only how you perceive it. anal scenes are shameful for example and there is absolutely no model who would want to do scenes like that instead only vanilla content at best - yet - still she's mentally not suited to make that decision
8) The images should not be used ongoing to produce gain for the company instead most if not all models are ashamed and want the material to be taken down immediately or soon afterwards
9) After claiming models aren't mental stable or addicted suddenly they want a normal life and the scenes will haunt them long afterwards
Did I get that right?
You're sounding less and less like someone from this industry and more like a very zealous Christian poster who's gotten their news from Fox or mainstream media as to the state of the adult industry rather than how it actually is.
I am appalled that you would even think that is how this industry is run much less your opinions on the models reasons and purpose for doing so. In fact - and this will be hard for you to believe there are more intelligent models out there who made a logical decision - well thought out on what they wanted. Those who are in the industry would know that - any to finish off - obviously you have no concept of the resources open to models for help should they fall prey to anyone
https://pineapplesupport.org/
Finally - what you fail to realize as well is IF any producer/person is found to treat their models anything less than professional the general rule of thumb is very few if any will work with them again. Doesn't matter who they are fired.
Of course you won't believe any of this - but our opinion of models is far better than yours apparently.