Quote:
Originally Posted by plsureking
bro you don't know shit about VR or VR sales. where are your stats? you have a negative view of VR because you don't like it. we've been over this.
even your opinion of the VR threads is wrong. can you even prove that every VR thread is "generally met with laughter"?
you're too ignorant and old to understand VR. you don't have to post negativity on every VR thread. its only you laughing - and everybody under 30 laughing at you.
#
|
Hi King,
With all due respect, you should dial that back and consider apologizing. That is not cool at all. Mrmister posted an honest question, and Legacy answered him. If you have data that disputes his reply, you should simply share it in the thread instead of attacking.
Your post suggests that everyone over 30 is too old to understand VR. If you genuinely believe this, then I submit that you are missing out on a huge market. Not only do people aged 30 and above understand and use VR, but they are also the main group that can afford the hardware. And if they can afford the hardware, they can afford to pay for the content as well.
While I am sure you know your stuff when it comes to VR, attacking and then dismissing someone with a lot of industry experience kind of makes you look like you don't know what you're talking about.
As an over-30'er myself, I love technology and have owned several VR headsets over the past few years. They are enjoyable for playing games, but they are only mildly interesting when it comes to video-only content. The reason is quite simple: VR for games and computer-generated content is 100% immersive. VR for video, however, is not. All VR really offers for video is good 3D. Strapping on a headset just to watch some porn is uncomfortable, inconvenient, and especially distracting, speaking um... from experience... for scientific research purposes only y'a understand.... ;)
Peace