100. On or about April 12, 2022, police raided the home where E. Gabbey was residing. Police removed E. Gabbey from the house, along with A. Untila—separated the two women from the other females residing there at the time. Upon information and belief, none of the other women at the home were treated as victims but required to endure uncomfortable conditions for hours on end. As an example, according to the sworn statement of I. Pencov, who was recovering from surgery at the time, she was forced, as a result of E. Gabbey’s outrageous conduct, to sit on a hard surface and go to the bathroom while being watched by a police officer. Only later did it become known that I. Pencov and B. Anghel, two neighbors who lived close by, were unknowingly being treated as victims against their will by the Romanian government. The affidavit of each person is attached hereto confirming such coercive conduct by the Romanian prosecutors.*”
Timestamp 1:00:00 - 4 "victims" were named, 2 of which repeatedly said they were not victims.
Jasmine & Beatrice
Jasmine
Video Timestamp 1:03:13
Beatrice: "Before the search happens everything in our house was perfect."
101. Upon information and belief, W.Gabbey, M. Gabbey, and M. Martelly knowingly, intentionally, and purposefully published false statements by E. Gabbey alleging grave crimes against her by the Tate Brothers, including “human traffick[ing]” her and “falsely imprisoning” her. These false statements directly impugned the character and professional standing of the Tate Brothers, which W. Gabbey, M. Gabbey, and M. Martelly communicated to the United States Embassy and several other persons and entities. At no point did the Tate Brothers engage in human trafficking of E. Gabbey or anyone ever, nor have the Tate Brothers ever been charged with the felony of human trafficking by any jurisdiction anywhere in the world. Because the statements were made knowingly and/or with a reckless disregard for their falsity, and therefore with malice, they are not protected under Florida law.
102. E. Gabbey clearly acted with malice when she falsely accused the Tate Brothers of human trafficking and false imprisonment, in the same manner in which she has maliciously perpetuated falsehoods for her own benefit in many previous relationships. The difference being that this time, her malicious falsehoods resulted in the immediate and unjust incarceration of two innocent men. Her actions were deliberate. The consequences of her actions, including the deprivation of the Tate Brothers’ freedom was completely foreseeable, and likely then end goal considering her perilous history of destroying men’s lives.
103. As stated above, E. Gabbey has a nefarious history of revoking sexual consent in order to extort men. She likewise, accused T. Tate of physically abusing her while having intercourse — namely, choking her until she passed out. However, approximately two weeks after making the fantastical accusations of human trafficking and other crimes of moral turpitude against the Tate Brothers, E. Gabbey and A. Untila were already vacationing on the French Riviera “mentally preparing for our upcoming adventure.
104. Upon information and belief, E. Gabbey is the owner of the Instagram handle, “Furyfatale,” and A. Untila was at some point the owner of the Instagram handle, “AlionaUntila.” This was confirmed in photographs provided by Romanian witness, I. Pencov, who provided an affidavit, which attests to taking the screen grabs of the pictures attached hereto as Exhibit H.
105. Being the opportunist she is, E. Gabbey, appears to be ready to seize the moment on social media, and has recently been associating herself with various human trafficking organizations to promote herself on the internet and various social media platforms. But nothing could be further from the truth.
106. The serious allegations of human trafficking by E. Gabbey and others directly prompted Romanian authorities’ investigation into the Tate Brothers, resulting in the Tate Brothers’ incarceration and ongoing house arrest. Indeed, one Romanian judge in the Bucharest Court of Appeal found the evidence against the Tate Brothers for human trafficking and other criminal charges so unpersuasive that she ruled that “that the brothers should be allowed to move freely in Romania, without restrictions,’*4 according to the Associated Press and other international reports, prompting a rare split decision in which a third judge had to be called in to preside over the ruling and render the deciding vote.