AmateurFlix

There is nothing remotely deceptive about the project in my sig. The entire system, it's mechanics, and the treasuries are completely 100% transparent and available for anyone to inspect. Your pathetic attempt to repeatedly use the word "ponzi" to describe something which is clearly above your head only serves to undermine your reputation Ponzi's, by design, continuously drain incoming funds through fraudulent means to pay early investors at an unsustainable rate; in contrast, Elephant.money keeps growing larger and larger treasuries, and ever deepening liquidity. This is not possible with a ponzi, you ignorant twatwaffle.

Look at the growing liquidity, look at the growing treasury, look at the growing user base. All fully transparent.

Moreover, this thread isn't about the project in my sig, it is about the hazards and risks of bitcoin. As soon as I brought up some valid concerns about bitcoin, you being unable to refute them, instead attacked the project in my sig and by extension my reputation, yet again.

I get it, you've been parading around gfy trying to pass yourself off as some kind of crypto guru and now your little charade has been revealed, your game is over. Boo-fucking-hoo, that is the price you pay for misrepresenting yourself in front of your colleagues. Frankly, I don't care what game you're playing or who you're trying to present this fraudulent image of yourself to... but you're not going to do it at my expense.

I will call you out on your deception every fucking time that you mention my name or my sig.

That medium article you linked - anybody can write on medium, it's a free platform and anyone can post regardless of their knowledge or lack thereof - is citing taxes as some kind of proof that it's a scam, and it only gets more idiotic from there. Moreover, the article is old and is describing an earlier version of the system mechanics which is no longer even used... so the whole thing is inaccurate and not worth addressing.

Had you the ability to comprehend the whitepaper I would be happy to debate it with you; but you don't, so instead you're going to leverage attack pieces which you don't comprehend either.

Newsflash - the largest projects in crypto, good or ill, all have attack pieces written about them that seek to leverage SE keyword traffic.

Congratulations for your ability to remember a general warning posted on damn near every crypto broker's website. It is a guide, not a rule. Some projects are more profitable than others, this is one of them.

Not even close. Another false accusation.

I suspect the reason that you keep bringing this up is that you've likely purchased bitcoin at some point in the past two years and as such are likely underwater right now, and are projecting your own problems and your own con onto me. Is that the reason you keep trying to bring new people into bitcoin?

You can't refute my criticisms of it, you only ever deflect and change the subject.

__________________