Quote:
Originally Posted by dcortez
What is "the job" that generative AI lets "non-lazy people" do?
And is the work product of such efforts of any value? To whom?
It seems that producing a consistent, intentionally limited, output benefits mostly those who are vested in maintaining that output/narrative, while consciously obscuring actual critical authoritative, competence-based, information.
Incomplete, even misleading, fluff overshadows (by volume), displaces, and ultimately replaces authoritative knowledge.
To keep it in perspective, adult entertainment is all about fluff - unless you're dealing with safety in the industry, and health-related issues.
And where other, non-X-biz, more serious affairs are concerned, socially, politically, gen AI is an even greater threat to objective understanding.

|
yea as you say, the AI gets filled with fluff. the thread about AI getting dumber goes deeper on that issue.
one "job" that is being supplemented massively right now is teaching. chatgpt is a part of every classroom, either as a teaching tool or cheat tool by students.
education seems to be the largest adoption group so far. marketing and SEO are close behind. sales teams are using it to help manage CRM, eliminating at least some hours of work, if not a junior position.
all i gotta say about it is:
#