View Single Post
Old 09-27-2023, 07:06 AM  
thiva7
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelli58 View Post
The truth is i just checked and from total 40871 videos , but all sites that well ranked have around 40 to 50 char . i already start editing titles anyway. i just trying to understand.

>> Well you kind of just answered your own question there didn't you? You have a video and a title with 40 to 50 characters? Is that really it?

I would suggest treating each video as a blog post. Can you get 300 to 500 words describing each video? If not go feed your movie titles to Caption Queen scene description AI and let it help you.

That alone will make a massive difference for you.
Caption Queen does not offer API , do any one know any AI that offer api and allow adult?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzxxx View Post
Make the thin content no longer thin. Google misleads in a number of ways. But, one thing that they do sort of get right is penalizing (or just not ranking) thin content. They get that wrong too sometimes. But, a manual action saying it's thin...add to it.
Thats why i am here and asking how to add to it


Quote:
Originally Posted by NatalieK View Post
many people here have explained to you what you need to do to remove the google penalty...

domain.com/12345/some-slug-of-video
with
domain.com/98745/many-worm-in-movie



this is different

Thanks , will check how to fix that issue


Quote:
Originally Posted by emmasexytime View Post
if it's the milf site fix your https and how you set it up, that should fix your issue
Not even close.
Ps: on of my compactor does not even have HTTPS/SSL , and rank better than me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wankawonk View Post
the info in this thread is 15 years out of date

you don't need unique titles, long descriptions, unique content

you need a site where your SE traffic has extremely low bounce rate and extremely high time on site. (unfortunately that's very fucking hard to do...don't get your hopes up.)


I could believe that about bounce rate and time on site , but when i compare my site in similar web ( since i dont have GA data of other sites )

in time on site and bounce i am in better condition than my competitors

my data is

Avg Visit Duration : 00:04:56
Pages per Visit: 9.95
Bounce Rate: 43.8%

Some other site data

Avg Visit Duration : 00:03:54
Pages per Visit: 8.68
Bounce Rate 45.39%

another

Avg Visit Duration 00:04:08
Pages per Visit 4.4
Bounce Rate 49.28%

Another

Avg Visit Duration 00:03:38
Pages per Visit 5.46
Bounce Rate 43.32%


i mean , based on available data is hard to believe that google banned me for bounce rate , and time on site , when out there is sites with same or worst stats .
__________________
[B]Buying Hardlinks : [email protected] / Skype = thiva7 or paris7
thiva7 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote