Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
You need to understand the following, in order to generate AI nudes:
- You have to train it on real data sets, of real nudes of real people -- for whose nudes you will need to have the proper documentation for, therefore the 2257 WILL apply, if you disagree here, please explain why.
|
Yes I disagree, here's why: AI-generated images of people do not directly correspond to real individuals. Instead, these images are synthesized from patterns and features learned during the model's training process, which involves analyzing a vast collection of images. The model learns to understand and replicate various aspects of human appearance, such as facial features, expressions, and poses, without copying any specific individual's likeness.
When you generate an image of a person using one of these AI models, the resulting image is a unique creation that doesn't depict a real person you can specifically identify. It's an entirely new entity synthesized by the AI based on its learned data. This means you typically cannot know "who" the image is since it doesn't correspond to an existing person, unless of course you use an image of a person as a part of the prompt. For example, if I use an image of Angelina Jolie in my prompt process, THEN the result would be based on a real person. Am I right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
Just because it's "AI" doesn't mean that you can now completely ignore the fact that you will at some point have to prove that your "AI" wasn't trained illegally,
|
Wouldn't it be up to the other party to prove that my AI was trained illegally? If you accuse someone of a crime, you have to prove they committed that crime.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
and that the pictures that you are showing were created from the nude pictures that you had rights to, and that they were of people of age as well
|
Yes, but I would suggest this. If the Image Prompt (an actual image) was of someone that the creator did not have the rights to use, then that person would have the problem. To me that sounds legally sound. is that right?