Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark
Perhaps AI images, like paintings, are new works of art. Photoshopped images are edits of existing art?
Poor lawyers...!  |
The AI image is created by editing original images and combining them.
It's nothing more than automated photoshop.
You're just taking a buzzword (AI) and making it into something that is magic, instead
of expanded image editing.
Artist have been sued for their paintings and t-shirts.
Quote:
Me :
can an artist be sued for making a painting of a person without consent?
ChatGPT :
The legality of creating a painting of a person without their consent can vary depending on several factors, including the jurisdiction, the context of the painting, and whether the painting is considered a form of protected expression or potentially an invasion of privacy or defamation.
In many jurisdictions, creating a painting of a person without their consent is generally legal if the painting is considered a work of art and not used for commercial purposes. This falls under the concept of freedom of expression and artistic freedom. However, if the painting is used for commercial purposes, such as selling prints or merchandise featuring the image of the person, it may infringe on the individual's right to control the commercial use of their likeness, which could lead to legal issues.
Additionally, if the painting portrays the person in a false or defamatory light, the individual depicted may have grounds to sue for defamation or invasion of privacy, depending on the laws in their jurisdiction.
|
