Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd
Has the Met-Art case been settled or ajudicated? Because if not a suit means nothing until a verdict. Plus, that is Kansas, not every State.
But okay I will play along: no nudity, nice words only. Good to go?
And what about X, Instagram, etc? Places that show nudity or near nudity? If they also have to age verify....it will be interesting to see how they fight it.
But as far as the processors go: using that old argument of 'I'm not selling it I'm just collecting the money for it' wouldn't work in a strip club or whorehouse so why would it work for digital media? Supposedly 2257 had a safe harbor provision that the tubes thought they were following by NOT reviewing every video. What happened to all of that?
The real thing here, I think, is how strcit Visa and MC will be. Enforcement is an issue with millions of websites but if Visa/MC lay down 'the law' then everyone who wants processing will have to follow it.
What a shit show, eh?  |
It's a shitshow yes, but when you think about it, it's (1) expected, and (2), it's not that bad. Kids can get instant access to porn now and while I wouldn't care if my kids saw boobies, I can completely understand why some parents would trip-out.
In a way, we are all really lucky that the new laws are coming into effect now that the technology exists to do whats required.
Cheers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Damage
I'm just wondering what kind of free site is actually gonna pay $0.30 per user or even $1k–$5k a year / domain just for people to jerk off on it?
|
Where is the price coming from though? Wobbie complained about a crazy-high price earlier in this thread. Whoever quoted you that is bonkers.