Quote:
Originally Posted by Wautier
Just like in Masterson's case, there is a reason why the statute of limitations should not apply if there are multiple victims. It proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a serial predator, and he deserves to be where he is.
|
The Appellant’s Opening Brief submitted on December 18, 2024, demonstrates two fundamental flaws in Danny Masterson's convictions: (1) the trial was rife with erroneous judicial rulings that skewed the jury’s view of the evidence against him and (2) there was a stunning amount of exculpatory evidence which was never presented to the jury,” it reads.
You speak of justice 'exculpatory evidence' is often not allowed because judge's have made up their mind that the MAN is guilty!
Believe me when I say the opposite is way to often the truth when the woman is just ignored.
It did NOT prove beyond a reasonable doubt or there would not be an appeals process.
Two women getting together to go after a man is not a reason for a judge to ignore the law.
there is NO law that states
"statute of limitations should not apply if there are multiple victims."
Judges DO NOT have the authority to MAKE law. They have been given or should I say they have taken the power.
I do not have an opinion on his guilt, only that the process was NOT followed legally and that the CASE IS NOT OVER.