Originally Posted by Wautier

Giving consent on film means absolutely nothing in the eyes of the law, unless there are credible witnesses, and other evidence as well.

If you felt uncomfortable in a situation and wanted to go home, to safety, you would pretend everything was ok and wanted to get it done and over with, and report it when you feel safe enough.

There is one paysite in particular that coerces females into doing things that they do not wish to do, and CCBill is processing for it. How they manage to go through compliance, I do not know. But, I guess that outsourced Serbian support is most definitely not actually checking the videos properly, either.

What I am trying to tell you here is that they did in fact give consent, but whether or not it would stand up in court is something entirely different. If she is clearly not comfortable with doing anal, and you continue pushing, and pushing, and pushing... she is bound to agree at a certain point simply to make it stop.

I am most certainly not trying to be no "captain-save-a-hoe here", I am most certainly a feminist at heart, not disputing that, but it's quite obvious that we are very very far from reading the visual cues from the scenes, and checking for the social cues as well, whether the performer is feeling comfortable or not, if she is being coerced, etc.

Compliance teams in the adult industry are an absolute joke, and the processors are in for another storm with VISA and MC, that's a given. Whether you believe me or not, compliance is a joke, and it's outsourced to brainless idiots.

Rape is rape... be it if it happened to a civilian, a working woman, or an adult performer. It doesn't matter what means were used to do it. It only matters that it happened... and that's what sucks. 'Roided punks, incels, and all-around assholes will always do as they please, regardless of the consequences.