Does Go.cam have a whitepaper like Yoti? You said that there was evidence and test data but I don't see where you've posted it.
When I asked Go.cam months ago about my concerns with face-api.js and tesseract.js, both used in their open source implementation, I was met with a very business-heavy hand wave, which pushed me away from them and toward other companies in this space.
I like that it's continually being developed, but I don't see any concrete information about what they're improving.
Yoti's white paper suggested that there was as high as a possible 10+ year gap in age detection via age estimation. In those cases, my understanding is that it falls back on ID scan + facial recognition.
I am not sure I fully trust certification companies, because when I reached out to them about what their tests were, they never got back to me.
I also saw that Go.cam isn't fully free, which makes sense honestly, because of this line:
Quote:
|
(including the option for advanced live presence detection).
|
Without live presence detection, I don't see how we can be sure that this isn't just a fake webcam or an AI generated face.
My clients speak to their lawyers, and their lawyers can tell them how to prepare for a lawsuit in this area or how to protect themselves as best as they can, but they do not have intimate knowledge of these systems. When I'm asked whether a system like this can do what their lawyers say protects them the most, it's very difficult for me to say yes or no without transparent and plentiful information.
It would be nice if AVS companies would start carrying insurance for lawsuits. Now that would put my clients minds at ease.