Quote:
Originally Posted by Publisher Bucks
Agreed.
Its the buyers responsibility to ensure that not only the ad is compatible with the traffic source, but that they do a 'test' campaign first to ensure the results they receive are what they expect.
If no due dilligence was done before hand, thats 100% on them, period.
|
thats true..but this is not what happend here..i did a deal with him before that.. which worked out kinda fine..not the numbers he was selling but atleast it was real
the other one
he did send fake traffic..in fact he didnt even send any kind of traffic he used a 3rd party website named trafficbooster that sells ga refferer fake traffic...thats why it wasnt registered in any other analytics tool excpet for google analytics...we talk about 10k hits a day which ddnt generated a single ad impression..thats what made me curious in the first place then i investigated
and HE offered the refund in the first place which he doesnt say like always...he did send 3 days of fake traffic then stopped on a 3 month campaign..he agrred on the refund stopped sending..all in the email exchanges..
i g ave him the benefit of the doubt at first..thought maybe he was reselling and got "scammed" himself without knowing but as i saw he doesnt give a single fuck about anything..i know he knows exactly what he is doing
and yes im gonna fuck you for scamming me