Amputate Your Head

true.... and I'm not looking for a big argument here... just making a point. No, it may not have passed the W3C Validator test... but so what. It doesn't affect the useability of the site in the least. It's a non-issue.

And just so there is no doubt, I've been running more urls through their little test... here's what I've found so far:

Other Adult Industry Cash Sites failing the W3C Validator:

Triple X Cash: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.triplexcash.com
CE Cash: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...www.cecash.com
Silvercash: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.silvercash.com
PlatinumBucks: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.platinumbucks.com
WEG Cash: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.wegcash.com
Hustler.com: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.hustler.com
Traffic Cash Gold: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...iccashgold.com
SIC Cash: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.siccash.com
Ice Cold Cash: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.icecoldcash.com
Top Bucks: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.topbucks.com
Niche Wealth: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.nichewealth.com


Other well known sites failing the W3C Validator:

Network Solutions: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...ksolutions.com
Apple.com: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.apple.com
MSNBC: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.msnbc.com
FOX News: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.foxnews.com
CNN: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.cnn.com





so as we can all see.... the W3C Validation is worth about as much as an old paint stick.

__________________
SIG TOO BIG