Quote:
Originally posted by RiverRat19602003
Hi all,
I usually use a different name here, just so you know. I want to begin this topic under an alias for legal reasons.
I think we can all band together to stop Acacia without spending a dime. I do support the idea of fighting them legally too. Meanwhile, we simply bleed them while they try to find us!
It occurs to me that they can simply search google for "adult" "video" "download" and find an endless source of targets.
I propose
That we compile a likely list of keywords i.e. Video, Streaming, mpeg etc.... and ask every adult site to add them to their meta tags and in plain text somewhere on their page. This means any adult site, with or without video, will show up in a search.
Those of us without video make a vague (just like their claim) claim to have video, with a disclaimer that we do not promise it. i.e. "This site cannot promise to offer video due to a patent issue."
Before you flame remember this. The technique needs refining. It's the idea that is important. If these bastards have to subscribe to every adult site to learn if video is used, they will go after an easier industry like Dish or Direct TV.
Rat
|
I see where you are going ...
I like the concept.
Because I don't have video ..."currently" ...
I have no problem being public.
What you are suggesting is a real , and acceptable, and purposeful Google.com bomb.
I'm in with both feet ..
As long as the sites contain information that is real - valid and not against the AUP of Google then - it's fair territory.