View Single Post
Old 10-14-2003, 10:33 AM  
Scott Kinney
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally posted by Project-Shadow
Indeed I am, if I am wrong I would have to accept the consequences. However have you seen the contract? For that matter has anyone? All you have so far is J.M's side of the story and Rob has kindly said his part in the situation 0.o
Actually, we have more than just 'J.M's side of the story'; we have

Sweet Entertainment Group saying that AB's use of Fisting Lessons content violates their terms of service.

DBM, who has never, and does not now license the internet rights to any of their releases.

MultiMedia Verlag, who has never licensed internet rights to any of their releases.

And you can't really write off J.M's action since they've gone to the trouble and expense to investigate the issue and initiate legal proceedings.

On the other hand, we have Rob saying, (and I'm paraphrasing) 'well, we have special licenses we bought from a 3rd party and I'm not going to say who, and I'm not going to show them to you.'

Rob would gain a whole lot more sympathy with a little more information than he is getting with a story that's only a step above 'the dog ate my homework'.

As an affiliate, you have a right to view these supposed licenses. In fact, I think you have a duty to do so to mitigate the damages should any infringing material appear on your site.

Saying "On thus-and-such date, I requested a copy of the licenses, I received them, read them and believed them to be genuine." would be a lot better for you than your current stance of "I can't be bothered."
__________________
Scott Kinney

Diversified Video Associates
Scott Kinney is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote