View Single Post
Old 10-17-2003, 06:39 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally posted by Stud Money
As part of the CE settlement wasnt there a non disclosure type deal setup?

If so, why are they mentioning them in the letter huh?

Same reason as they are off showcasing Hustler and Vivid, because someone buried in their agreement probably says they could.

I believe the issue with CE is that rather than referencing them by their corproate name, they were using the CE and CEcash names, where are trademarked, and so CE was probably trying to go after them for mis-using their trademark.

Acacia's brag sheet, I mean list of Press Releases:
http://www.acaciatechnologies.com




Fight the Patent!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote